- #Acronis home version that works for server 2008 pro
- #Acronis home version that works for server 2008 Pc
- #Acronis home version that works for server 2008 professional
#Acronis home version that works for server 2008 Pc
Alas, backup remains a little too unfashionable for it to walk away with the prize, but if every PC had a copy of Acronis True Image 10 installed, the vital process would surely become second nature to all.
#Acronis home version that works for server 2008 pro
it's so popular here that we nominated it in the Software of the Year category at last month's PC Pro Awards.
#Acronis home version that works for server 2008 professional
Aude ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC) PC Pro (a major UK PC magazine aimed at the professional rather than home market) has had it in its 'A List' (the 'best' available in a number of categories) for a long time. It's a product carried by major retailers such as J&R Music and Computer World, CompUSA in their brick & mortar stores, and has been reviewed by CNET, PCWorld, etc. An editor has expressed the opinion it looks like a commercial.Ĭould someone provide cites to support the case that this article is notable in software terms, in order to prevent its deletion being considered? FT2 ( Talk | email) 20:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Look at the previous AFD. This article seems to cover a non-notable piece of software. I have cleaned up the Operation section, removing a reference to a comparision with True Image 7.0, which is now 4 versions old. There is nothing exceptional about ATI's ability to backup through any of those methods. I think the section on supported backup locations is un-necessary. Or BESR if you take the Universal Restore into account. It is more like Backup Exec if you want to choose a Symantec product to compare it to. I think the introduction regarding its similarity to Norton Ghost is a bit off. This whole article is fairly badly written.
I have also changed the wording in the Universal Restore section regarding how UR works. It is Acronis True Image 9.1 Server for Windows, not Acronis True Image Server for Windows 9.1. I have changed the nonclementure (?) used in the bottom section. It is not compatable with Server for Linux, so I placed it within the brackets instead.
The sentence states Acronis Enterprise versions, so the Home exception is implied. It replaced True Image Home with Server for Linux in the section regarding Universal Restore. Instead the article should be labeled as unbalanced. While this page does look like a commercial, that doesn't mean that the article should be scrapped. Also obtained a list of filesystems instead of saying "Arconis supports most filesystems". Billyoneal 02:56, (UTC)Įdited page to make less biased. Does every product on the market get its own Wikipedia page?